PUBLICATIONS & REPORTS
In a response
to Malcolm Chalmers’ article in the December 2013
edition of the RUSI Journal, Hugh Beach argues that
it is time to move on from 1980s rhetoric of ‘unilateral’
versus ‘multilateral’ disarmament and to
act in the UK's true national interest.
Volume 159, Issue 2, 2014
Sir Hugh Beach:
'How would Britain fare as a non-nuclear weapon state?'
given at the 60th International Pugwash Conference,
Istanbul 1-5 November 2013
further information on the conference go to
Pugwash Quinquennial Report 2007-2013
Quinquennial Report report was produced
to coincide with the International Pugwash Quinquennial
in Istanbul 1-5 November 2013
Newsletter provides up to date information
on British Pugwash activities between annual reports.
ethics of military robotics: developing international
agreement on ethical principles relating to the military
exploitation of modern information and communications
Pugwash organised a two-day expert scoping workshop
to examine the ethical implications of current
and possible future developments in modern military
robotics on 20-22 March 2013 at the University
of Birmingham. This initiative followed a suggestion
by John Finney at the 2012 meeting of the UNESCO
World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Information
and Technology (COMEST), on which International
Pugwash has an ex officio seat.
Read the report
link between non-proliferation and disarmament in the
Final report of a British Pugwash Group project
by Matthew Harries, Associate, Centre for Science and Security Studies, King's College London
A British Pugwash team, led by Carol Naughton, conducted a project based on 29 one-to-one interviews with representatives of 24 key NPT states parties, as well as a diplomatic roundtable, to identify possible grounds for a new consensus on the link between non-proliferation and disarmament in the context of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, with consideration for the potential role of the United Kingdom.
Read the report
that summarises the project's findings
Pugwash Annual Report 2012
Read or download the report
to 2050:Three possible UK energy strategies
During the next 40 years, the UK will have to rebuild its energy supply infrastructure almost completely, at a cost of about £3 trillion. Our present pattern of energy supply and demand is totally inappropriate in a world threatened by climate change. We need to reshape it completely before it is too late.
Public opinion is deeply divided on the choice of technologies to be used to bring about the required restructuring, and also about the scale of achievable energy savings which might influence this choice. The only unambiguous guidance from government has been an international commitment that the UK will reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases by 80% by the year 2050.
British Pugwash has published an expert report designed to address these issues. Pathways to 2050:Three possible UK energy strategies discusses three possible UK energy strategies which have been constructed using the ‘Pathways to 2050 Calculator' which has been made publicly available by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC).
Each strategy (‘High Nuclear', ‘High Renewables' and ‘Intermediate' ) achieves the 80% reduction, and uses energy technologies which either exist or can reasonably be expected to be brought to sufficient commercial maturity in time.
Read or download the report
of Nuclear Weapon Dismantlement: Peer Review of the
UK MoD Programme
Mr Brian Anderson, Gen. Sir Hugh Beach , Prof. John Finney, Dr Nick Ritchie,
Prof. Ruben Saakyan, Dr Christopher Watson
Pugwash has for many years been actively involved
in developing thinking within the UK on the steps
towards the eventual goal of the universal abolition
of nuclear weapons. We recognise that this will
be a long process, and that there will need to
be many intermediate steps, aimed at reducing
the size of nuclear weapon inventories, and creating
mutual confidence in taking further steps. Within
this process, a politically and psychologically
important element is the verification that mutually-agreed
disarmament measures have actually taken place
in the manner declared. Without international
confidence in the verification process, it is
all too easy for those who wish to undermine the
process to claim that such agreements are ineffective.
We were therefore
pleased that UK MoD invited us to undertake an
independent peer review of its past decade's work
towards developing a credible technical framework
for the verification of dismantlement of nuclear
weapons. A team from British Pugwash was given
significant access to their work in this area,
which is carried out within the framework of the
UK's Global Threat Reduction Programme.
The report presents our conclusions.
provides up to date information on British Pugwash activities
between annual reports.
of the UK 's Plutonium Stocks
In November 2009 the British Pugwash Group published a report of its working group on The Management of Separated Plutonium in the UK . Since then DECC, the Government department responsible for the management of the plutonium stockpile, has been undertaking investigations of the three options discussed in the BPG report.
In February 2011 it published its preliminary conclusions, and launched a 'consultation' on those conclusions, in the form of seven specific questions about its general approach.
BPG submitted its response on 9 May 2011, but has not hitherto published it, following the normal convention for bodies providing evidence to government. However, DECC has now informed us that it has no objection to our doing so also. We understand that DECC intends to publish the result of this consultation shortly.
the British Pugwash response
We are pleased to introduce
the first of its kind, to provide up to date information
on British Pugwash activties between annual reports.
Disarmament in the UK
In response to a high level request for an overview of UK non-governmental work on nuclear disarmament, British Pugwash has produced a directory of the UK-based NGOs and individual experts that have a focus on the non-proliferation and disarmament of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Read more
price nuclear blackmail ?'
General Sir Hugh Beach challenges the
doctrine of nuclear deterrence, arguing that nuclear
weapons have never acted as a ‘credible' deterrent.
Citing several historical cases of conflicts in which
nuclear weapons failed to play a strategic role, the
paper criticises the UK's commitment to maintaining
nuclear weapons, nd calls Trident ‘a White Elephant
that is not worth its keep'.
Blackaby Paper No 9 , Abolition 2000 UK Available
by mail for £3.50
A series of background briefings , produced in conjunction with the Parliamentary Liaison Group, aims to inform British parliamentarians on the UK 's nuclear weapons policy and its context:
Briefing 1 - State of play; Briefing 2 - Deterrence; Briefing 3 - Initial Gate; Briefing 4 Britain's Key Role
For a full list of British Pugwash publications, click here